Conspiracy or the Dark Side?

We often label things out of the ordinary as conspiracy theories when they are simply another point of view. In fact, the very act of labeling ideas as conspiracy silences thought. There is no shame in freely expressing your thoughts as crazy as they are. Who am I to judge you, when this is both our first times being alive. It's far more dangerous for me to label you as a lunatic conspiracy theorist and reduce your pool of thoughts than it is letting you speak. When we inevitably subconciously give up our right to think about certain things are we but a shell. Now, forgive me for pedaling "conspiracies." Remind yourself, this is simply another point of view, my point of view.

Let me give you an example.

The name, Adolf Hitler rings many bells. Before you roll your eyes and click away, I want ask where you got those thoughts about him from. Were they truly yours? Did your formulate them based on the evidence you have gathered? Or were they planted upon you by school, by friends, by media, or by society at large? Did you know him personally? Were you even alive when he was around? Have you talked to him? He would also have a lot of things to say. There is always another side to the story and to ignore it is pure ignorance. Ignoring another side of the story while sitting on moral highground in your own beliefs is disgusting hypocracy. If he was wrong, then what do you have to fear from what I say?

Maybe Hitler did the things he did because he truly believed the Jews were controlling the world to free his people, he must get rid of them all to ensure the "loaches", quoted by Hitler himself, would never return.

The burning of books is often mentioned. However, one never mentions that the books Hitler burned were not classics but included those surrounding homosexuality, transgenderism, and pornography. It wasn't just about "protecting values" but eliminating dissent. In fact, the US has banned more books than the Nazis have burned

His consolidation of money from the rothschild controlled private banks to the state banks reduced the control that the private sector had on German economy.

"I clearly saw what was developing in Germany, and I realised then that the stiffest fight we would have to wage would not be against the enemy nations but agaisnt international capital" - Hitler

Mind you, the Rothschild's dynasty controlled the banks of Paris, Frankfurt, London, Vienna, and Naples. In fact, this London branch was the one that funded Wellington against Napolean who set up a state bank almost 100 years back. In the aftermath of Napolean's defeat, James Mayer de Rothschild's Paris branch rose to prominance funded by the pockets of his brother in London.

In fact, one of the known ways the Rothschild made their wealth was through war. By destablizing Europe, these banks were able to finance countries for profit. Since they controlled all the major banks of Europe, they diversified risk, making money on all sides.

Another interesting point is Operation Barbarossa. Hitler feared the Jewish Bolshevist regime in the Soviet Union so he pushed further, terminating his alliance with the Soviets. I'm pointing this out because Marx, the one who wrote the Communist Manifesto was indeed Jewish ethnicity. We could go down the rabbit whole of how Communism was a Jewish tactic to control the world through the controlled opposition between Capitalist and Communist forces or how there was an internal schism inside the leadership, but I have not formulated enough thoughts to comment.

The Holocaust is often mentioned as the end-all-be all example of a genocide. However, why do we ignore the genociding of the Chinese by the Japanese when the deaths were magnitudes larger? Is it because the Chinese are somehow now our enemy and deserve minimal sympathy? Even the Nazis were horrified by these atrocities. In the aftermath of WW2, the state of Israel was created as sympathy. Why do we only shine a light on some while ignoring others? More intresetingly, who is shining the light?

Now, you might be thinking, "YOUR ANTI SEMITIC". Again, these were my own thoughts, I never said I am right. Are you not allowing me to think? The truthful reality is one day, you could be him. Your mother can be him. Your father can be him. Hitler doesn't need to be right about everything - no one is correct about everything - but there is often some truth in what people believe in. We discount everything he stands up for simply because at a young age we were fed the fact that he is evil. Imagine if he won the war - you would be on the opposite side right now. He would be celebrated like some sort of hero instead of being painted as a mass murderer. There really is no black and white answer to who is good and who is bad but the fact that we label him as such proves the existence of a higher agenda pushed on us. I'm sure he had even more things to say but we silence him and label him as evil without further evaluation. In fact, very very few people in the world have conviction so powerful to wage wars and fight multiple years for their people. That alone signals that he truly had conviction in the words he spoke. Otherwise, he would have fell apart under pressure a month in. It's like setting New Years resolutions. Most people speak. Only the determined do.

Now, lets go back. Where did you get your thoughts from? By school, by friends, by media, or by society at large? Maybe even by yourself. If so, congratulations. You are free to disagree with me. But it would be dangerous carry around somebody else's thoughts. And a final point - who are you if all the thoughts you contain aren't even yours?